ebuyer daily deals 40% off

better spelling new header

Texting- it’s quick, efficient and pretty much free- It’s become the dominant form of communication used by the youth of today, but is it ‘harming’ the English language and are concernes that it’s dumbing-down children’s grammatical abilities really founded?

Well, according to a recent report, texting and ‘textisms’ are not as bad for our beloved language as we may have been led to believe… and remarkably, some examples may show that texting is improving the way children write.  

better spelling image

Testing the Youth

Nenagh Kemp, a language psychologist at the University of Tasmania and Clare Wood, of Coventry University have spent the past few years studying the topic.

Kemp and Woods new study is one of several over the last 5 years that appears to show that, for children and teens, there isn’t any direct correlations between using more ‘textisms’ and decreased performance in formal grammar and spelling tests.

In fact the data may allude to the contrary, texting and its creative shortcuts, could be ever so slightly improving the grammatical abilities of kids.

Kemps most recent test analysed text messages sent by 234 primary school, secondary school and university students over two days. After copying and analysing the messages for structure and ‘textisms’, they were then compared to the results of five traditional ‘formal tests’ on cognitive ability, grammar and spelling.

The results from this pool, albeit relatively small, appear to show that those with a higher use of textisms, on average, scored higher in the tests.

The data was also measured next to a year-long period to calculate language growth, and once again those with a higher propensity to use text speak, saw a larger growth in test scores over the course of the year.

The only correlation Kemp found between textism use and lower scores, was amongst college students where the data was relatively weak.

Hw cn  txtin b mking us betr @ spelin?shutterstock_139256642

So how on earth is missing vowels and shortening words making the kids better at grammar?

Well it doesn’t appear to be as direct as the study may like us to believe, but texting on a whole is a contributing factor.

The first aspect is creativity. Remembering or inventing all of those phonetic abbreviations appears to improve the way kids learn language. The “phonological processing” and linguistic awareness is still being developed, albeit with shortened words. But it still adds to the greater pot of spelling development.

There is also the aspect of time and practice. Think about how many hours teens log on to their phones every day, receiving and responding to the plethora of inane messages. Even the hardest cynic still has to agree those are still hours upon hours of ‘reading and writing’.

Most literacy experts believe a major part of developing skills is simply about putting in the time.

More Testsshutterstock_156824609

There have been a few tests along similar lines to what Kemp and Woods have done however all have been on relatively small groups of English speakers.

In 2008 it was found that 11 and 12-year-olds in Britain who used more textisms– like misspelled words ,bk” instead of “back” and grammatically incorrect substitutions “2” for “to” or “too”— scores slightly higher on standardised grammar and writing tests.

A test in 2009, conducted on a similar audience, found comparable associations between high textism use and slightly better reading ability.

It should be noted that all the tests only eluded to a “slight increase” on a small subject group.

Many people believe that for the data to be truly accepted, a much larger pool of users’ as well as languages needs to be studied.

What about the traditional methods?

Don’t go throwing away your kid’s books just yet, traditional methods of education are still clearly preferable to letting your children loose on your mobile for their education

The idea is that kids can differentiate between what’s to be used as ‘text speak’ and what is expected in more traditional conversation. Kemp comments

“Parents and educators need not panic that exposure to abbreviated and unconventional spelling and writing styles in digital communication will lead to the ruin of young people’s conventional literacy skills”

The worry, however, has always been that kid’s won’t be able to differentiate between text and standard communication.

From texts to WhatsApp: The new generation.

Texting and how we text has evolved over the last 5 years. We’ve gone from cramming data into 350 characters to unlimited ramblings. Most network carriers charge a flat rate for texts and often offer unlimited free messages. Platforms like Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp and Skype also offer completely free, unrestricted messaging.

Users who’ve been brought up in this unrestricted text generation are actually more likely to use full incarnations of words, as there’s no reason to shorten ‘Please’ to ‘pls’ or too and ‘2’- It’s free, why bother?

There is however the additional crutch of predictive text and new generations of smart keyboards that essentially guess what your next word will be. Could this make users lazy and cut off the creative element that has helped ‘nurture’ previous texting generations?

 

Digital_Native Ebuyer raising the digital generation

 

9 COMMENTS

  1. Is this article pre-historic? Who would be dumb enough to fight with their auto correction to “try n writ lik dis?” I don’t think so…. Unless you are using a prehistoric Nokia 5110 and have only 25 text messages per month. Prediction hasn’t only been available on “new generation of smart keyboards” it’s been available for years (unless you are an iPhone user which have only just introduced prediction text… For Android users it’s been around for years!!). Even the t3 dictionary on Nokia phones used to spell out words.

    People should stop writing articles like this.

  2. I’ll start by saying that, ‘concernes’ isn’t a word. This study proves nothing. It could be just that the smarter kids text more. Texting shouldn’t really make anyone more stupid because if you can’t differentiate between proper spelling and text talk then you’re already stupid. You also can’t blame this current trend on the inabilities of the youth because there’s no discernible difference in the spelling and grammar we see today as opposed to 10 or 15 years ago. The problem is (if you don’t want to put it down to how people are taught) laziness. This is the typical attitude of a growing number of people and not just the younger generation. Some people can’t string even one sentence without leaving a mistake and this seems to be growing as I’m starting to see it more. If anything the youth should be trumping us as they’re currently still in education and are fresh but it seems not. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve seen people use the following, ‘alot, aswell, could of’. They also get confused when to use the words, ‘there, they’re, their’ and most often get them mixed up. The number of people who use, ‘then’ instead of, ‘than’ is also increasing. People can’t even write a few helpful words when reviewing a product but instead opt for, ‘it does exactly as it says on the tin’. I replied to this once and informed the person there was no tin and isn’t the product supposed to do that anyway. We want to know how well it does it, is it durable, is it reliable. Like I said, people are too lazy to think. It’s not the text talk nor the teachings of these people that is causing the problem, it’s the people themselves. I think there’s no way back as people are lazy, selfish, uncaring and top of the list, always think they are right.

  3. I don’t know if it’s making us stupid, but it can’t help in my view. I insist on spelling all my texts correctly because it keeps me practised in my spelling, especially since I don’t read as much as I should. So, yes, it takes me `ages` to respond to a text from my daughter, but I won’t stop doing it. That said, to my astonishment, my Father (who`s 71) recently got a mobile phone and he texts just like my daughter – I used to think it was a random kid texting me! I never dreamed he would even own a mobile phone let alone text-spell like a kid.

    I still refuse to text like that.

  4. I would be more impressed if your article were not conspicuous for its (without an apostrophe) bad spelling and grammatical gaffes. “Let him who is without sin cast the first stone”.

  5. I hate predictive texting. It’s about as accurate as reading the future by the auguries (the flight patterns of birds) or the entrails of a recently slaughtered goat. I always switch it off. I never truncate words other than those that have already entered the English spoken language (eg. OK) but, fwiw and fyi I’m happy to use text contractions to replace some common phrases to save time. Innit?

  6. I am 76. Correct spelling and grammar were considered to be very important when I was at school. I was appalled when, about 30 years ago, the head teacher at my son’s school told me they didn’t worry much about spelling and grammar. I had complained about an essay written by my son which had been given high marks. The head said that it was the content of the essay which was most important, not the spelling or grammar.

    I often receive letters from government departments with spelling mistakes, grammatical errors and words missing.

    I have no objection to texting but as I have no mobile phone, text messages are occasionally sent to my landline. It can be quite a problem to decypher them!

    .

  7. I used to think that text abbreviations and substitutions were bad, but not any more. I accept that they are another means of communication, like Morse Code or the coloured pennants used on ships. Thankfully, a little easier to learn!
    73 everyone, its time 4 a cup of t or a glass of rng jc…

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here