Share this post

The Evolution of Ebooks

Nothing brings together the timeless pleasure of reading with the lustre of shiny new gadgetry quite like an eBook. Here’s a visual guide to this relatively modern phenomenon, which has actually been around a lot longer than you’d think.

How have eReaders changed? Who first came up with the idea? How does eInk work? Are you sitting comfortably? Then I’ll begin…

working at computer monitor

Share this post


Add yours
  1. naomi 3 March, 2015 at 08:13

    Wow, now we realise why you skipped pie, and mash.well done son. Love you both so,da, Meggy. Xxx

  2. Stuart B 6 March, 2015 at 14:25

    You missed out the iRex Iliad – lovely machine, large format, not quite as big as the big Kindle, which I also now have. Nice controls, slightly strange software, cost a bomb (about 450 GBP in 2007 IIRC). Dutch origins, I think, but marketed by a UK company.

    I put all my tech manuals on it, as I was commuting by air to my various contracts at the time.

  3. T 21 March, 2016 at 14:10

    Ebooks are definitely not cheaper than real printed books thanks to the government sticking VAT on them whereas physical books are VAT exempt.

    There is also no second hand market for ebooks.

  4. Jeremy Boden 27 June, 2016 at 12:48

    You didn’t mention the downside of ebooks.

    1. They’re often burdened with DRM.
    2. Inconvenient to underline, highlight add notes etc.
    3. Impossible to skip a couple of pages / refer back to earlier text or have two non-adjacent pages open simultaneously.
    4. They are often just a PDF file with a fancy name.

    I could go on…

  5. doh! 13 March, 2017 at 06:42

    1. Buy the right reader.
    2. Buy the right reader.
    3. Buy the right reader.
    4. No they are not.
    You probably could go on because you sound like a paperback troll.
    Say after me in a whiny voice,,,,”waaah, I like the feel of a real book in my hands”

  6. Kevin G 28 June, 2017 at 13:19

    I would have found this really interesting but I gave up reading early on because of the poor visual presentation. Namely pastel print on pastel bacground (look up “visual acuity”), varying fonts, varying type size. Yes it was very pretty and would have been awarded the highest marks in a design competition but not in any way an easy visual read.

Post a new comment